Member-only story

The Death of the Actor: A Theoretical and Practical Exploration

Grayson Bell

·8.1k Followers· Follow

Published in DEATH Of The ACTOR: Everything I Never Learned About Nothing

5 min read

937 View Claps

91 Respond

Save

Listen

In the annals of theatre history, the concept of the "death of the actor" stands as a provocative and enduring idea. At its core, it posits that the traditional notion of an actor as a distinct and separate entity has become increasingly obsolete in contemporary performance practice. Instead, the actor is seen as a malleable and fluid construct, whose identity is shaped and reshaped through their interactions with the text, the audience, and the broader socio-political context.

The origins of this idea can be traced back to the early 20th century, with the rise of avant-garde theatre movements such as Expressionism and Futurism. These movements sought to challenge traditional notions of realism and representation, and in ng so, they began to question the role of the actor as a separate entity from the character they were portraying. In Expressionist theatre, for example, actors were often masked or costumed in a way that obscured their individual features, while in Futurist theatre, they were frequently used as mere props or extensions of the machinery of the stage.

DEATH of the ACTOR: Everything I Never Learned About Nothing

by Kyle Secor

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	5311 KB
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Print length	:	181 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

In the decades that followed, the idea of the death of the actor gained increasing traction. The work of influential theorists such as Antonin Artaud, Bertolt Brecht, and Jerzy Grotowski pushed the boundaries of theatre practice even further, and their writings and manifestos helped to solidify the concept within the contemporary theatrical landscape. Artaud, in particular, argued that the actor should be a "vessel" through which the raw energy and emotion of the play could flow, rather than a mere mouthpiece for the playwright's words. Brecht, on the other hand, saw the actor as a critical mediator between the text and the audience, using their performance to provoke thought and reflection.

In practice, the death of the actor has manifested itself in a wide range of ways. One common approach is the use of "found objects" or "non-actors" as performers. In these cases, the actor's traditional role as a trained and experienced performer is subverted, and the audience is instead encouraged to focus on the raw humanity and authenticity of the performer's presence. Another approach is the use of "devised theatre," in which the actors collaborate with the director and other members of the creative team to create a performance that is not based on a pre-existing text. In these cases, the actor's role is more akin to that of a co-creator, rather than a mere interpreter of the playwright's words.

The death of the actor has also been a major influence on the development of contemporary acting techniques. The Stanislavski System, which was once the dominant approach to actor training, has come under increasing criticism for its emphasis on the actor's internal emotional life. In contrast, contemporary techniques such as the Meisner Technique and the Suzuki Method place more emphasis on the actor's physical presence and their relationship to the other performers on stage. These techniques encourage actors to focus less on creating a fully realized psychological portrait of a character, and more on using their bodies and voices to create a dynamic and engaging performance.

An Actor Wearing A Mask And Performing In An Abstract Setting. DEATH Of The ACTOR: Everything I Never Learned About Nothing

The death of the actor is not without its critics. Some argue that it has led to a decline in the quality of acting, as actors become more focused on concept and spectacle than on the craft of performance. Others argue that it has made theatre more elitist and inaccessible, as audiences are less able to identify with actors who are not playing clearly defined characters. However, despite these criticisms, the death of the actor remains a vital and influential concept in contemporary theatre. It is a reminder that the actor is not simply a vessel for the playwright's words, but a creative artist in their own right. By embracing the death of the actor, theatre practitioners can continue to push the boundaries of performance and create new and exciting ways to engage with audiences.

The death of the actor is not an end, but a beginning. It is a challenge to traditional notions of performance and a call for new and innovative approaches to theatre. By embracing the death of the actor, we can create a theatre that is more inclusive, more dynamic, and more relevant to the challenges and opportunities of our time.

DEATH of the ACTOR: Everything I Never Learned About Nothing

by Kyle Secor

4.7 out of 5